Mindfulness: the missing facet 'describe', and meeting at relational depth with self & others - practice
Originally added on Tue, 08/11/2011 - 07:16Last updated on Thu, 08/12/2011 - 06:03
I wrote yesterday on "Mindfulness: the missing facet 'describe', and meeting at relational depth with self & others - theory" . Today I'd like to take this into a practical example.
Mindfulness: the missing facet 'describe', and meeting at relational depth with self & others - theory
Originally added on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 05:09Last updated on Thu, 08/12/2011 - 06:09
God guard me from those thoughts men think in the mind alone; he that sings a lasting song thinks in a marrow bone. William Butler Yeats
Friendship: science, art & gratitude
Originally added on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 04:34Last updated on Sun, 31/07/2011 - 05:20
(this post is downloadable as both a Word doc & as a PDF file.)
About every three months I meet up with one of my oldest and dearest friends and we spend twenty four hours or so together checking in on how our lives are going and what our plans are - this "work" links to the post "Building willpower: the seven pillars" Our friendship goes back nearly 30 years and we've been doing these check-in's for a decade or so. We know each other pretty well! I'm just back from one of these times and it leads me to think a bit about friendship.
Proposal for a BABCP special interest group on compassion
Originally added on Thu, 30/06/2011 - 05:28Last updated on Fri, 08/07/2011 - 05:25
The British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP) encourages the formation of Special Interest Groups (SIG's) in areas that members want to particularly focus on. There has been discussion recently about a possible SIG on Compassion. If you're a member of the BABCP and you would like to be involved, do please let me know (if you haven't done so already). I've made some suggestions about the kind of territory a Compassion SIG might cover (see below), but I very much understand that people who are interested in the SIG, may well not be interested in all the areas I've suggested ... and they may have additional suggestions to add. The aim would be discuss all this further once we see if there at least 15 of us who would like to support the SIG's establishment.
Who can you trust ... and do they have to be boring?
Originally added on Fri, 10/06/2011 - 04:44Last updated on Tue, 05/07/2011 - 04:48
May's edition of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology contains three articles on trust that got me thinking a bit. It's been said that the qualities that attract you to a potential partner (or friend) may well end up being the very issues that become most problematic in the relationship. So, for example, one's partner's ability to be spontaneous, emotional, let their hair down & have a great time may later become a real issue over their drinking, extra-marital affairs, and irresponsibility with money. Or from the other end of the personality spectrum, their reliability and conscientiousness may become a real strain because they later seem over-cautious and kill-joys. Anyway here's three additional contributions to this debate:
Setting up a therapists' support group 2
Originally added on Tue, 25/01/2011 - 06:05Last updated on Tue, 25/01/2011 - 07:02
I wrote yesterday about the email that was sent out last autumn asking several fellow psychotherapists up here in Edinburgh whether they would be interested in forming a Therapists' Support Group.
Setting up a therapists' support group 1
Originally added on Mon, 24/01/2011 - 06:14Last updated on Tue, 25/01/2011 - 06:47
Seven of us got together yesterday afternoon to talk about possibly setting up some kind of therapists' support group. We're all therapists ourselves, and some of us are close to or on the mature side of 60. All male therapists, so we're kind of "the Grizzlies". Why do it? It's mostly been me who has got this inital meeting to happen ... with some help from a friend. Why the effort? The email we sent out at the end of November was headed "Invitation to a therapists' support group" and it read:
Greetings.
Recently two of us ... who have been involved with counselling/psychotherapy for many years, have been talking about some good things that might emerge from meeting up with other experienced therapists. We've batted around a whole series of ideas and one that has emerged looks loosely like this:
Recent research: 4 studies on prayer and their implications for compassion, loving-kindness & goodwill meditation practices
Originally added on Wed, 24/11/2010 - 04:52Last updated on Thu, 02/12/2010 - 06:21
"If you want others to be happy, practise compassion. If you want to be happy, practise compassion" Dalai Lama
Peer groups: Ravenstor autumn group 7 - feedback, ecology & goodbyes
Originally added on Thu, 18/11/2010 - 06:45Last updated on Mon, 22/11/2010 - 13:29
Peer groups: Ravenstor autumn group 6 - respect & friendship
Originally added on Wed, 17/11/2010 - 06:41Last updated on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 04:42
It's a couple of days since we drove back up to Scotland from Ravenstor. I blogged yesterday about the last morning of the group and I was thinking a bit about judgements and who we choose as closer friends. I feel a bit uncomfortable exploring this issue as I don't want to be dismissive of other human beings. However there is a valid question - do some characteristics or qualities that people have make them "better" potential friends than other characteristics or qualities do? For me the answer is a clear "yes".